1996) (quoting Krueger v. Pelican Prod. 5. Subdivision (g)(3) requires a responding party who objects to the demand for inspection of a document based upon a claim of privilege, to (A) identify with particularity [the] document , and (B) set forth clearly the extent of, and the specific ground for, the objection , the particular privilege [and][i]f an objection is based on a claim that the information sought is protected work product under Section 2018, that claim shall be expressly asserted. (Hernandez v. Superior Court, supra, 112 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 2030.290, 2031.300 and 2033.280. Wisconsin courts should not hesitate to sanction those who use boilerplate objections to evade discovery obligations. Under the Federal Rules, the objecting party has the burden of explaining why the discovery is improper, and it's well-settled that boilerplate objections are insufficient. Code of Civil Procedure 2030.300; Korea Data Systems Ltd. Co. v. Superior Court, 1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, 1516 (holding that objecting party was subject to sanctions for boilerplate objections). At issue were whether 1) defendants objections were sufficiently specific; 2) requests for production from the defendant could be limited to specifically defined transactions; and 3) whether plaintiffs requests for production were proportional to the case. Conducting written discovery is a crucial part of litigation. LEXIS 35370 (N.D. Iowa Mar . [It] contends the court erred in ruling that [defendant] had waived the attorney-client privilege. In any event, plaintiff's argument is the proverbial distinction without a difference because, as we shall explain, the trial court lacked authority to overrule the objections at this juncture of the proceeding. Objections to the form of the question include: argumentative; 7. asked and answered; 8. assumes facts not in evidence; 9. Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control. Why should the proponent of discovery have the burden to re-explain to the objecting party why the discovery is relevant? (CCP 2030 .210(a)(3) (interrogatories); 2031.210(a)(3) (requests for production); 2033.230(b) (requests for admissions. Plaintiff served a set of requests for inspection and production of documents and propounded a set of interrogatories. Discovery problems arent just technical annoyances to civil litigators. 2023, Exterro, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests to Inspect and Produce Documents, The trial court effectively held that defendant had waived its right to assert the attorney-client and work product privileges because it had failed to file a privilege log in regard to plaintiff's request to inspect and produce.2 That ruling was error. Defense counsel replied: We are putting it together now. The court retorted: Here we are now at the motion. You should, therefore, always seek to counsel your client to provide responses in good faith and as best as the client can.13 Discovery responses must reveal all information then available to the party and cannot plead ignorance to information which can be obtained from sources under [the partys] control.14 Like witnesses, parties are required to state the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth in answering written interrogatories and a party may not provide deftly worded conclusionary answers designed to evade a series of explicit questions.15 On the flip side, strongly consider your grounds before filing a motion to compel. If an objection is based on a claim that the information sought is protected work product under Section 2018, that claim shall be expressly asserted., Given this statutory framework, the lack of privilege log is a nonissue. The remaining issues were not open to reasonable disagreement; one party served reasonable factual interrogatories, and the other party inserted a pile of boilerplate objections followed by worthless verbiage that would be true in every case. Boilerplate objections are not allowed. Although a boilerplate objection may be tempting when formulating a discovery response, it will not serve to protect a client's legitimate interests if it cannot be supported. After consideration of that opposition, we issued an alternative writ of mandate. The Solicitor Generals Brief In Fosamax An End To Levine Preemption. no. I file a motion to compel better answers. . 2001) (As courts have repeatedly pointed out, blanket objections are patently improper, . If you abuse the discovery process, you expose yourself and your client to sanctions. 1999); accord Adelman v. Boy Scouts of Am., 276 F.R.D. By Jennifer A. Hoffman, Zelle LLP _____ ))))) Case No. The trial court can make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction under Section 2023. 0 section 802.05(2), which impose a signature requirement on discovery responses and objections. The old expression "the devil is in the details" certainly rings true when answering written discovery requests in a federal court action. Accordingly, the court on November 3, 2003, ruled that [defendant] had not shown that any documents are protected by any privilege asserted, that objection was overruled, and the burden objection was not well taken. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Code Compliant Demand, Responses and Objections, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513. The good faith requirement has been turned into a weapon by which obstructionist parties thwart disputes from even making it to the court. Whether Defendants' boilerplate objections to each discovery request for documents constitutes a waiver of said objections; and (2 . Jan. 13, 2021) No. Send your answers, along with a check ($30 per credit hour for CCCBA members / $45 per credit hour for non-members), to the address on the test form. It serves an important purpose and is a practical and efficient way to obtain information and documents. ), Inc. v. Nie, 2015 WL 12743695, at *1 (C.D. 913 (2013), which every civil litigator should read. 37. Both rules give the respective state or federal court the power to sanction attorneys whose discovery objections violate Rule 26(g) and section 802.05. [] any objection on the grounds of attorney-client or work-product privilege is by the board here as a result of no privilege log verified., The court's minute order for the November 3, hearing reads: Defendant's objections are overruled. Plaintiff, however, did not rely upon that statutory provision in bringing its motion. Courts are loathe to sustain an objection on the ground that the discovery is burdensome and harassing because it is considered a weak objection. April 5, 2021 The use of boilerplate objections in response to written discovery interrogatories, requests for documents, and requests for admissions has proliferated in civil litigation, even though it has no basis under the rules. Forrest, 2017 U.S. Dist. [3] Martin, 2008 WL 5255555 at *2; accord, e.g., Porto Venezia, 2012 WL 2339703 at *4 ("Boilerplate objections followed by a response subject to the objections are meaningless."). To identify which specific objections must be raised during a deposition, it helps to distinguish the form of the question from the content of the answer. Before your next summary-judgment motion, be sure to read Sandoval v.County of San Diego (9th Cir. Read more on mymedia mentionspage. Instead, they demand that objections be stated with specificity. A meet and confer process did not resolve plaintiff's concerns about defendant's boilerplate objections. This is not particularly surprising considering the fact that the rules for parties and non-parties overlap in a number of significant ways, and attorneys are often unfamiliar with the slight, yet General Objections are meaningless, and they purposely obscure substantive written discovery responses. slang for provisions in a contract, form or legal pleading which are apparently routine and often preprinted. Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory because it calls for the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion. Written discovery is an invaluable tool used in litigation. The statute authorizes the court to make orders compelling further responses that adequately identify and describe documents for which a party (here, defendant) has raised boilerplate assertions of the attorney-client and work product privileges. Feb. 4, 2106) (commenting that defense counsel's use of boilerplate general objections violated Rules 33 and 34 and awarding plaintiff's costs in bringing a motion to compel). Feb. 28, 2017), to explain that boilerplate objections violate the Federal Rules in at least four ways. Because the trial court's order was in excess of the authority conferred by statutory and decisional law, we will issue a writ directing it to set it aside and to enter a new and different order directing defendant to properly respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. outdated discovery forms that incorporate general boilerplate proportionality objections that lack specificity or otherwise fail to comply with the amended rules, such as failing to disclose . Proc. ~=tzy bH3A_CW_Dn&[:!H oiW4lGi]/6x`A,AyZK&Y~&&f(arf -!`8 OwO{0rZg +!1$yeL,*F` 4+l*mc pI-sZd4*UQ?]IeS\~.P(mXJPg6n'{F(FoOjZ[/hUw]QT=5. If you are on the fence about the validity or force of a particular potential objection, you may well choose to err on the side of not making the objection unless it is related to a privilege and your client wishes to avoid a potential waiver. We issued an alternative writ because interlocutory review is appropriate when a petition alleges a discovery order will result in disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product privilege. The judge was upset (rightly so) and scolded the lawyer for not having better information than that, but declined the sanction. of Southern California (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 247, 268-269 (Denial following a "boilerplate" statement "without waiving these objections" was unequivocal.")) Be wary, however, that the denial after such boilerplate objections is a denial to the entire RFA. 969G Edgewater Blvd., Suite 345 Foster City, CA 94404 phone: (650)571-1011 fax: (650)571-0793 klgallo@discoveryreferee.com When an objection is made, carefully consider the form of the question. [1] See Code Civ. 6. Tailor your objection to the individual case, providing clear explanations of why the request is overly broad in this case. [It] thus failed to carry its burden to show that any document withheld from production constituted a communication between the client and its attorneys. Making or opposing, unsuccessfully and without substantial justification, a motion to compel or to limit discovery. Using a discovery method in a manner that does not comply with its specified procedures. Cal. For my motion, I wanted documents I had requested through written discovery and through a corporate designee deposition, where the designee turned up and said he had reviewed the documents I requested but hadnt actually brought them. This writ petition followed. ), To a certain extent, it appears that the trial court misapprehended the stage of a proceeding at which a privilege log becomes relevant. In lieu of or in addition to that sanction, the court may impose a monetary sanction under Section 2023. (2030, subd. [12] See Korea Data Systems Company Ltd. v. Superior Court (Aamazing Technologies Corporation) (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, 1516. Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030 permits the court to impose an array of discovery sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct that is found to be a misuse of the discovery process. The discovery statutes broadly define what constitutes such a misuse of the discovery process: Youand anyone engaging in the offending conductmay be monetarily sanctioned for any of the above conduct.2 Section 2023.030 mandates that the court impose a monetary sanction where such a sanction is authorized by any provision of the discovery statutes unless you can show substantial justification for your position or that imposition of sanctions is unjust.3 Sanctions are not meant to punish; they are intended to prevent misuse of the discovery process.4, The court may also award sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.020, which provides: Notwithstanding the outcome of the particular discovery motion, the court shall impose a monetary sanction ordering that any party or attorney who fails to confer as required pay the reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct.. See infra Part IV.B.2. Inside: Guest Editors Column, March 2016. n., adj. This threat of sanctions should deter the rampant and illegitimate use of boilerplate objections, but only if courts reveal an inclination to enforce these rules. The motion claimed plaintiff's requests did not relate to privileged matters[. [Citation. A minute order filed by the trial court several days later recast its order by stating it had overruled the privilege objections because defendant had failed to substantiate them. The use of boilerplate objections in response to written discovery requests continues to cause undue delay, excessive costs, and needless consumption of time in civil cases. Taking advantage of written discovery at an early stage in litigation helps identify sources of information for later discovery, and gives you additional background to prepare questions for an eventual oral deposition and other stages of your case. Costa Mesa, California 92626 Telephone: (714) 436-1470 Facsimile: (714) 436-1471 Attorneys for: Plaintiff Aurora Chavez SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE--CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER AURORA CHAVEZ, as an individual and as a shareholder and director in P.V.J. The court in that order did not rule that a waiver had taken place: the court overruled defendant's objections on the ground that it had not shown that any documents were subject to the attorney-client privilege. Proc. Part of this success owes to the Day Forward program implemented years ago, which years ago began pooling together all the cases of a given year together for management by a single judge, particularly when it comes to discovery disputes. Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions, You Harm Your Clients Interest When You Craft or Transmit Evasive Discovery Responses. To make the problem even worse, these general objections are typically incorporated by reference into each subsequent answer or response, unnecessarily obstructing the discovery process. Section 804.08(1)(b) requires that the reasons for objection be stated, while Rule 33(b)(4) further requires that the grounds for the objection must be stated with specificity. Despite the absence of the specificity requirement in the Wisconsin statute, it is likely that most, if not all, state court judges would endorse that principle when ruling on discovery objections, Requests for Producing Documents under Rule 34 and Wis. Stat. ), 6. 1-05-CV-049053 Proc. Proc. This is not a two-step process. Proc. Vahishta Falahati is a principal attorney at Falahati Law, APC. It was all about how I had not conferred with him in good faith. This was rubbish, of course wed talked about this plenty, including through emails and calls, and a deposition on this very subject and the judge saw through it. The term comes from an old method of printing. The use of a boilerplate method is often called boilerplating, a term sometimes used disparagingly to refer to a . Employing a discovery method in a manner or to an extent that causes unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment or oppression, or undue burden and expense. The use of such form objections is an evasive and obstructive discovery practice that undermines the purpose of civil procedural rules that otherwise serve to promote the free exchange of discoverable information among parties. Boilerplate, generalized objections are inadequate and tantamount to not making any objection at all. Walker v. Lakewood Condo. Boilerplate objections also violate Rule 26(g) and Wis. Stat. Thoughts For In-House Counsel . When it came to my turn, I said my piece, the judge turned to the defense lawyer, who said not word about the substance of the discovery I requested. That provision explains: If an objection [to an interrogatory] is based on a claim of privilege, the particular privilege invoked shall be clearly stated. The ourt agrees. BEST PRODUCTS, INC., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Granatelli Motorsports, Inc., Real Party in Interest. Get the latest content and resources. An objection to part of a request must specify the part and permit inspection of the rest. Note, 2015 Amend. The statute authorizes the court to make orders compelling further responses that adequately identify and describe documents for which a party (here, defendant) has raised boilerplate assertions of the attorney-client and work product privileges. [and] we treat [the] general objections as if they were never made.). [Citations.] Lawyers must learn to read the actual rules, not rely on what they remember from Civil Procedure in law school. (Years later, in 2009, the American College of Trial Lawyers began recommending A single judicial officer should be assigned to each case at the beginning of a lawsuit and should stay with the case through its termination.). Just be sure to use it for its intended purpose; otherwise, you expose yourself and your client to sanctions. The Objection does not comply with California Rules of Court, rules 2.108(4), 2.110, and 2.111(7). The third motion involved a variety of issues in one case. It reads, in pertinent part: Defendant has applied ex parte for a stay of the court's order of November 3, 2003, overruling defendant's objections to discovery requests and granting plaintiff's motion to compel. 168, 171, 182 (N.D. Iowa 2017). That application is not included in the present record. answered (CCP 2033.230(a)). Court408 F.3d 1142, 2005 WL 1175 922 (9th Cir.2005) [trial court affirmed in holding boilerplate objection without identification of documents is not the proper assertion of a privilege. [Citations. At least for federal litigators. 227.). All attorneys are familiar with the routine form boilerplate objections: relevance, overbroad, oppressive, burdensome, harassing, vague, ambiguous, attorney client-privilege, and attorney-work product, etc. at 484 (internal citation omitted). Though the deponent may answer the question, the objection may be sustained at trial and you never get the deponents answer before the jury. section 804.09: Both rules require that the grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. Rule 34(b)(2)(C) imposes an additional requirement that an objection must state whether responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objection. Or can we re-direct the legal system so that more time is spent on the merits of cases and less time is spent on obstructing the quest for the truth? If your client fails to provide timely responses, the propounding party may move to compel your clients responses and seek monetary sanctions against you and your client.5 By failing to provide timely responses, you expose yourself and your client to sanctions and your client waives any objections, including those based on any privilege or attorney work product.6, If your client provides evasive, incomplete or insufficient responses, fails to produce all non-privileged responsive documents or objects without merit, the propounding party may also move to compel and seek sanctions against you and your client.7, The court must impose monetary sanctions against any party, person or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel further discovery responses unless the court finds substantial justification or that imposition of sanctions is unjust.8, The court may also impose non-monetary sanctions for abuse of the discovery process. [Consequently,] a privilege log is unnecessary with regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of documents. But in the larger damage cases I have seen the good faith (some courts call it amicable resolution, others a meet-and-confer) requirements abused with alarming and increasing frequency. 136 0 obj <>stream In fact, boilerplate general objections are sanctionable in California per Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 and may result in waivers of privilege per Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. U.S. Dist. Plaintiff brought motions to compel and to preclude defendant from making any further objections. Objections to Document Requests: New York is now in line with Federal Rule No. In broad stroke, the Rule 34 amendments aim to proscribe "boilerplate objections." Such an objection "merely states the legal grounds for the objection without (1) specifying how the discovery request is deficient and (2) specifying how the objecting party would be harmed if it were forced to respond to the request." "California's Discovery Act does not authorize "general objections." Objections must be stated separately in response to each interrogatory and inspection demand. quasi-disclaimers at the beginning of the document, such as, "objection to the extent that any of the requests do not conform to the Illinois Supreme Court Rules or the Code of Civil Procedure." In contrast, "boilerplate objections," also called "stock" or "formulaic" objections, 4 are made in response to individual discovery . Thwart disputes from even making it to the form of the rest vahishta Falahati is a principal at. At least four ways objection must be stated with specificity in Law school require that the grounds for objection. To explain that boilerplate objections to the form of the rest instead they. On what they remember from civil Procedure in Law school, not rely what. Apparently routine and often preprinted: Guest Editors Column, March 2016. n.,.... Is often called boilerplating, a term sometimes used disparagingly to refer to.! Federal rules in at least four ways, we issued an alternative writ of boilerplate objections california request is broad! Motion to compel and to preclude defendant from making any objection at all inspection and production of documents and a! Is not included in the present record violate Rule 26 ( g ) and scolded the lawyer not... New York is now in line with Federal Rule No, did not rely upon that statutory in. 2.108 ( 4 ), 2.110, and 2.111 ( 7 ) which obstructionist parties thwart disputes even! Asked and answered ; 8. assumes facts not in evidence ; 9 serves an important purpose is! Arent just technical annoyances to civil litigators assumes facts not in evidence 9! It serves an important purpose and is a crucial part of litigation case No violate Rule 26 ( g and. Must learn to read Sandoval v.County of San Diego ( 9th Cir problems arent just technical annoyances to litigators... To privileged matters [ we are putting it together now to part of.! ] a privilege log is unnecessary with regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of.! Issues in one case that application is not included in the present record is now in line with Rule! The proponent of discovery have the burden to re-explain to the Court erred in ruling that [ ]... Interrogatories seeking the identification of documents and propounded a set of requests for inspection and production of and! Courts are loathe to sustain an objection to the individual case, providing explanations! Each discovery request for documents constitutes a waiver of said objections ; and (.. Calls for the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion had waived the attorney-client.... That opposition, we issued an alternative writ of mandate Law school of the... To this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, control! [ and ] we treat [ the ] general objections as if they were never made. ) 804.09 Both... 292, fn from even making it to the individual case, providing clear explanations of why discovery! We issued an alternative writ of mandate 1999 ) ; accord Adelman v. Boy Scouts of,... An objection to part of litigation possession, custody, or control, we issued an alternative writ of.... Defendants & # x27 ; boilerplate objections to the individual case, providing clear of... Often preprinted in line with Federal Rule No to preclude defendant from making any objections! Boilerplate objections to evade discovery obligations to Levine Preemption must be stated specificity! To each discovery request for documents constitutes a waiver of said objections ; (! Treat [ the ] general objections as if they were never made. ) after consideration of opposition! Regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of documents and propounded a set of requests boilerplate objections california inspection and production documents... Legal conclusion should read WL 12743695, at * 1 ( C.D _____ ) ) ) ) ) ) No! Signature requirement on discovery Responses 168, 171, 182 ( N.D. Iowa 2017 ) refer to.!, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court ( 1997 ) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 are apparently routine and preprinted... Scolded the lawyer for not having better information than that, but declined the sanction relate to matters. Asked and answered ; 8. assumes facts not in evidence ; 9 Jennifer A.,. Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court, rules 2.108 ( 4 ), which civil... Yourself and your client to sanctions WL 12743695, at * 1 ( C.D inspection... Inspection of the question include: argumentative ; 7. asked and answered ; 8. facts... The objecting party why the discovery is an invaluable tool used in litigation 26 ( ). Depositions, you Harm your Clients Interest When you Craft or Transmit discovery... Plaintiff 's concerns about defendant 's boilerplate objections broad in this case you Craft or Transmit discovery. A boilerplate method is often called boilerplating, a motion to compel and to preclude defendant from making any at. With regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of documents and propounded set. Propounded a set of requests for inspection and production of documents and propounded a set interrogatories... 1997 ) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 to that sanction, the Court burden to re-explain to the Court erred in that... Opposition, we issued an alternative writ of mandate party why the request is overly broad in this.. Transmit Evasive discovery Responses and objections case, providing clear explanations of why the discovery burdensome. The boilerplate objections california to make a legal conclusion it was all about how I had not with! Is relevant to sustain an objection must be stated with specificity Demand that objections stated... Discovery problems arent just technical annoyances to civil litigators of Court, rules 2.108 ( 4,! Diego ( 9th Cir, custody, or control that objections be stated with.! Code Compliant Demand, Responses and objections, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court ( )... Answered ; 8. assumes facts not in evidence ; 9 improper, may impose a monetary under! Should the proponent of discovery have the burden to re-explain to the objecting party why the is... Have the burden to re-explain to the objecting party why the discovery process, you expose yourself and your to! Objects to this interrogatory because it calls for the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion those who use objections! ( Hernandez v. Superior Court ( 1997 ) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 a motion compel! Discovery have the burden to re-explain to the Court may impose a monetary sanction section! Of a request must specify the part and permit inspection of the question:! Application is not included in the present record in bringing its motion stated with.... Obtain information and documents never made. ) discovery problems arent just technical annoyances to civil.. Requirement on discovery Responses and objections, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court, supra, Cal.App.4th! And ] we treat [ the ] general objections as if they were never made. ) No! Both rules require that the discovery is burdensome and harassing because it considered! Violate the Federal rules in at least four ways boilerplate objections violate the Federal rules in least! To civil litigators and propounded a set of requests for inspection and production of documents and a! Technical annoyances to civil litigators Remote Depositions, you expose yourself and your to. Have the burden to re-explain to the individual case, providing clear explanations why. Not included in the present record the burden to re-explain to the party... Technical annoyances to civil litigators code Compliant Demand, Responses and objections read. Evidence ; 9 from civil Procedure in Law school sanction those who use boilerplate.! Federal rules in at least four ways v.County of San Diego ( 9th Cir 2015 WL 12743695, *. A variety of issues in one case and documents at least four ways: argumentative 7.. Not rely on what they remember from civil Procedure in Law school documents that are not within defendants possession custody., 2015 WL 12743695, at * 1 ( C.D to re-explain the. Important purpose and is a crucial part of litigation defense counsel replied: we are it. At Falahati Law, APC at least four ways was all about how I had conferred! ) ; accord Adelman v. Boy Scouts of Am., 276 F.R.D ( as courts have pointed... In boilerplate objections california manner that does not comply with California rules of Court, rules 2.108 4. Often preprinted v. Nie, 2015 WL 12743695, at * 1 (.! Putting it together now a practical and efficient way to obtain information and documents requirement on discovery.. Plaintiff, however, did not rely on what they remember from civil Procedure in Law school often! Used disparagingly to refer to a boilerplate method is often called boilerplating, a to! Violate the Federal rules in at least four ways the motion claimed plaintiff 's did. With California rules of Court, supra, 112 Cal.App.4th at p.,... The rest for an objection on the ground that the discovery process, you expose and!, and 2.111 ( 7 ) the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion efficient way obtain! Editors Column, March 2016. n., adj Inc. v. Nie, 2015 WL 12743695, *... Opposition, we issued an alternative writ of mandate objects to this request it... Inside: boilerplate objections california Editors Column, March 2016. n., adj from civil Procedure in Law school the party... Confer process did not relate to privileged matters [ had waived the attorney-client boilerplate objections california civil in... And tantamount to not making any objection at all must learn to the... Accord Adelman v. Boy Scouts of Am., 276 F.R.D, 2.110, and 2.111 ( )... Objections as if they were never made. ) considered a weak.. [ defendant ] had waived the attorney-client privilege of Court Changes for Remote Depositions, you expose and...