Therefore, the Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF Support, which is limited to five pages) may not exceed 15 pages. Submissions of proposals and progress reports are due to your Schools submitting office according to their deadline policy for review and authorization. Some governments require nonresidents to obtain official approval to carry out investigations within their borders and coastal waters under their jurisdiction. Whereas the prior C&P asked for Project Title, Project Dates, Source of Support, Amount of Funding, and Person-months dedicated, the new C&P requires a statement of the overall objectives of the project being proposed and a statement of potential overlap with any active or pending proposal or in-kind contribution. If IACUC approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the individual should indicate Pending in the space provided for the approval date. If guidance specific to the program is not available, then the requirements established in this section apply. This information is relied upon by NSF in formulating the total award amount and final award budget that is incorporated into any resultant award. Unless a substitute negotiator has been designated by the proposer/recipient, the Division of Grants and Agreements (DGA) or the Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support (DACS) will not process a new proposal with a former employee or IPA as PI or co-PI. Participant support costs must be specified, itemized, and justified in the budget justification section of the proposal. 3729-3733 and 3802. For these proposals, the project title must begin with the words "Collaborative Research: If funded, each organization bears responsibility for a separate award. If no such rate exists, the NSF recipient must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient. [37] To accommodate long names or other information, the font size may be reduced to fit data within the cell. In such cases, the item for senior personnel salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the person-months represented by that amount omitted. NSF uses the legal business name and physical address from the organizations SAM registration. The biographical information must be clearly identified as Other Personnel biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a EAGER proposal. Proposers should not submit the policy or code-of-conduct to NSF for review. To be a Project Director, Principal Investigator or to otherwise be responsible for the design, conduct or reporting of research regardless of title or position (e.g., an Investigator). No proposer-supplied information may appear in the margins. This supplementary documentation will not be counted towards the 15-page Project Description limitation; and. *Note: Other Support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending (Other) Support. In addition to other provisions required by the proposing organization, all contracts made under the NSF award must contain the applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR 200, Appendix II. Only internal merit review is required for RAISE proposals. The intention to request use of these NSF-supported national resources should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. for additional information. other products, such as data, databases, or datasets, physical collections, audio or video products, software, models, educational aids or curricula, instruments or equipment, research material, interventions (e.g., clinical or educational), or new business creation. (iii) All components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. The award size, however, will be consistent with the project scope and of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. (iv) Documentation of Collaborative Arrangements of Significance to the Proposal through Letters of Collaboration. endstream endobj 189 0 obj <. By signing the Cover Sheet, the AOR is certifying that prior to the proposers participation in the meeting, the proposer will assure that the meeting organizer has a written policy or code-of-conduct that addresses sexual harassment, other forms of harassment, and sexual assault, and that includes clear and accessible means of reporting violations of the policy or code-of-conduct. [42] Guidelines to the use of Wild Birds in Research; Guidelines of the American Society of Mammologists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research; Guidelines for the Use of Fishes in Research; and Guidelines for the Use of Live Amphibians and Reptiles in Field and Laboratory Research. RAISE proposals are not eligible for reconsideration, if declined. (ii) Entertainment. Conditions (i) (ii) and (iv) above are particularly relevant for consideration at the budget preparation stage. Resulting awards will be administered in accordance with standard NSF policies and procedures, including no-cost extensions and supplemental funding requests. List in, All scientific appointments, both domestic and foreign, All affiliations with foreign entities or governments, All titled academic, professional, or institutional appointments. The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. m@ [38]For purposes of meeting the mentoring requirement, simultaneously submitted collaborative proposals, and collaborative proposals that include subawards, constitute a single unified project. The Common Rule defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Proposers should describe only those resources that are directly applicable. To receive funding as a RAISE-appropriate project, all three criteria must be met. The PI may conduct preliminary or conceptual work that does not involve human subjects while the protocol is being developed or is under review, consistent with organizational guidelines. Reviewers will evaluate the information during the merit review process and the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency. While NSF will make every effort to prevent unauthorized access to such material, the Foundation is not responsible or in any way liable for the release of such material. What new knowledge generated by the proposed work could lead to innovations that can help address societal challenges? Each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file should leave out page numbering unless otherwise directed within Research.gov. Provide a list of up to five distinct examples that demonstrates the broader impact of the individuals professional and scholarly activities that focus on the integration and transfer of knowledge as well as its creation. (iv) If the project lacks definite plans regarding use of human subjects, their data or their specimens, pursuant to 45 CFR 690.118, the proposer must check the box for "Human Subjects" on the Cover Sheet and enter Pending in the space provided for the approval date. other products, such as data, databases, or datasets, physical collections, audio or video products, software, models, educational aids or curricula, instruments or equipment, research material, interventions (e.g., clinical or educational), or new business creation. Examples include: The total amount of direct costs requested in the budget, to include Lines A through G, must be entered on Line H. Except where specifically identified in an NSF program solicitation, the applicable U.S. Each proposing organization that is new to NSF or has not had an active NSF assistance award within the previous five years should be prepared to submit basic organization and management information and certifications, when requested, to the applicable award-making division within the Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management (BFA). ], and the Endangered Species Act (16 USC 1531, et seq. Exhibit II-1: Proposal Preparation Checklist, Exhibit II-2:Potentially Disqualifying Conflicts of Interest, Exhibit II-3: Definitions of Categories of Personnel. In some cases, Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. biologics, chemical, model systems, technology, etc.). Prospective PIs are advised that they must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of a RAISE proposal. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. The NSF approved Biosketch format (rev 10/4/2021 (NSF provided PDF) page limitation has increased to 3 pages. *Source of Support: Identify the entity(ies) that is/are providing the in-kind contribution. [28] This table supersedes in its entirety, Table 2a and Paragraph 7 of the Disclosure Requirements and Standardization Section of the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance. Any other direct costs not specified in Lines G.1. Interdisciplinary research and education projects that enable faculty from different academic departments or institutions to interact with one or more industrial partners in IHE-industry groups or networks are encouraged. The award size, however, will be consistent with the scope of the proposed planning activities and of a size comparable to planning grants in similar areas. This may include: School or Central Reviewers will coordinate with Grant Managers and PIs or Key Personnel to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the submission. The Other Support download and GMAS resources were originally developed to assist with NIH Other Support disclosures and may be used as a resource for NSF Current and Pending Support. More detailed information about the content is available in the Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter II.C.2.f (NSF website). The proposal may request funds under any of the categories listed so long as the item and amount are considered necessary, reasonable, allocable, and allowable under 2 CFR 200, Subpart E, NSF policy, and/or the program solicitation. Misrepresentations and/or omissions may be subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. Proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of Part I of the PAPPG pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. NSF does not negotiate rates for entities that do not yet hold direct NSF funding, nor does NSF negotiate rates for subrecipients. See Chapter V for further information. Temporary dependent care costs (a dependent is defined in 26 USC 152) above and beyond regular dependent care that will directly result from travel to conferences are allowable costs provided that the costs are: (i) a direct result of the individuals travel for the NSF conference award; (ii) consistent with the recipient's documented travel policy for all employee travel; and. A proposal for travel support, either domestic and/or international, for participation in scientific and engineering meetings is handled by the NSF organizational unit with program responsibility for the area of interest. While letters of collaboration are permitted, unless required by a specific program solicitation, letters of support should not be submitted as they are not a standard component of an NSF proposal. NSF funds may not be included or spent for meals or coffee breaks for intramural meetings of an organization or any of its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments, and centers, as a direct cost. Sr. Grant & Contract Officer/Federal Team Lead. must be identified on Line G.6. Pending any proposal currently under consideration for funding (including this proposal) from whatever source irrespective of whether such support is provided through the proposing organization or is provided directly to the individual. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. Indirect costs (F&A) are not usually allowed on costs budgeted as participant support unless the recipients current, Federally approved indirect cost rate agreement provides for allocation of F&A to participant support costs. A complete listing of NSF programs that require cost sharing is available on the NSF website. Examples that are not permitted include: Current and Pending Supportincludes allresources made available to a researcher in support of and/or related toallof their research endeavors, regardless of whether or not they have monetary value and regardless of whether they are based at Harvard. *Project/Proposal Title: Enter the title of each project/proposal being reported. sponsored fellow supporting your laboratorys research efforts), Positions, affiliations, and appointments that are related to a foreign talent (or similar type) program, All other resources (domestic or foreign) available in direct support of your research endeavors, Detailed information about the content is available in the, NSF requires a separate Current and Pending Support form. List names as last name, first name, middle initial, for whom a personal, family, or business relationship would otherwise preclude their service as a reviewer. For fellowship proposals submitted by individuals that involve the care and use of live vertebrate animals, the proposal should contain the information specified in paragraph b. above. 3729-3733 and 3802. Communications within team and to the organization should be considered in the plan, minimizing singular points within the communications pathway (e.g., a single person overseeing access to a single satellite phone), and any special circumstances such as the involvement of multiple organizations or the presence of third parties in the working environment should be taken into account. Research (see Chapter II, Sections A through D); Rapid Response Research (RAPID) (see Chapter II.F.2); Early-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) (see Chapter II.F.3); Research Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering (RAISE) (see Chapter II.F.4); Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) (see Chapter II.F.5); Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) (see Chapter II.F.7); Career-Life Balance (CLB) Supplemental Funding Requests (see Chapter II.F.8); Center (see relevant funding opportunity and Chapter II.F.12); Research Infrastructure (see relevant funding opportunity and Chapter II.F.13); or. The application must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in Research.gov. Such proposals would be designated as an Ideas Lab renewal.. If the Funding of an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box or Funding of a Foreign Organization, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box is checked on the Cover Sheet, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box(es) on the Cover Sheet. to foster safe and harassment-free environments wherever science is conducted. See Chapter IV.D.2.b. (See section C.1 below for additional information.). 139 0 obj <> endobj [22] In the rare case of funding to a foreign organization or foreign individual, see Chapter I.E.2 for additional requirements. This Special Information and Supplementary Documentation section also is not considered an appendix. Formatting and reviewing for completeness and accuracy. Rapid Response Research (RAPID) Proposal, 3. This includes: A systematic study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject studied. Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the organization is located. 1. For all eligible categories noted above, the supplemental funding request may include funding for up to six months of salary support or stipend for a maximum of $30,000 in direct costs of salary compensation or stipend, but the duration of the salary or stipend support may not exceed the duration of the family leave. The physical resources themselves are provided by service providers via separate awards from NSF. The types of information that may be requested is shown in the Organization Environmental Impacts Checklist. A separate budget and a budget justification of no more than five pages, must be provided for each subrecipient, if already identified. GOALI is a type of proposal that seeks to stimulate collaboration between IHEs and industry. If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. This includes, but is not limited to, information related to domestic and foreign appointments and positions. (i) Each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal PIN. 188 0 obj <> endobj If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. This includes: https://gmas.harvard.edu/gmas/othersupportdownload (Harvard provided link to automatic GMAS download of xls spreadsheet). NSF uses the information submitted in the Current and Pending Support section to assess the individual researcher's capacity to carry out the project as proposed and help assess any potential overlap or duplication with the project being proposed. This limit includes salary compensation received from all NSF-funded grants. [48] This coverage also applies to symposia and workshop proposals. Potential commitment overlap exists. General Current and Pending and Biosketch, The Common Rule defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Where meals or lodgings are furnished without charge or at a nominal cost (e.g., as part of the registration fee), the per diem or subsistence allowance should be correspondingly reduced. Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), 8. Each reference must include the names of all authors (in the same sequence in which they appear in the publication), the article and journal title, book title, volume number, page numbers, and year of publication. 0 The COA information must be provided through use of the COA template. Requests for Reasonable and Accessibility Accommodations, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended in 2017, 2. Contact Us, Privacy Policy| EU/EEA Privacy Disclosures|Trademark Notice |Digital Accessibility Policy |Harvard Home|Provost Home This definition does not normally include service on scientific or clinical advisory boards or more general scientific consulting unless it is anticipated that the individual will make a direct and significant intellectual contribution to a specific research project for the entity. Individuals with disabilities who need reasonable accommodations as part of the proposal process must contact the Office of Equity and Civil Rights (OECR) Disability Program Manager (DPM) at rarequest@nsf.gov at least 30 calendar days prior to the proposal deadline date. Proposals are reviewed for both their scientific and computational/data needs, as well as their readiness to utilize the resource. The number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the proposal budget. The research should further scientific and engineering foundations to enable future breakthrough technologies with the potential to address critical industry needs. In addition to standard research proposals that follow the proposal preparation instructions contained in sections A through D of this chapter, there are other types of proposals that may be submitted to NSF. See Chapter IV.D.2.b. A group travel proposal is encouraged as the primary means of support for travel. Investigators and Key Personnel will provide a complete and accurate disclosure on their Biosketch and Current and Pending Support. See also Chapter XI.B.1 for additional information on the administration of awards that include use of human subjects. (ii) Location: Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the primary organization is located. See also Chapter XI.B.3 for additional information on the administration of awards that include use of live vertebrate animals. The National Science Foundation (NSF) issued new requirements for Current and Pending Support reporting and Biographical Sketches (Biosketches) that went into effect on October 4, 2021. for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" NSF proposals; to support the collection of preliminary data; or. EAGER proposals are not eligible for reconsideration, if declined. If the proposal is being submitted for consideration by another Federal agency, the abbreviated name(s) of the Federal agency(ies) must be identified in the space provided. This supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results (see Chapter XI.D.4), and may include: Data management requirements and plans specific to the Directorate, Office, Division, Program, or other NSF unit, relevant to a proposal are available on the NSF website. Salaries requested must be consistent with the organizations regular practices. Chapter II.D.2.g must be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. *Person-Month(s) (or Partial Person-Months) Per Year Committed to the Project: Enter how much time the individual anticipates is necessary to complete the scope of work on the proposed project or award. NSF encourages prospective users to seek more information on the XSEDE website. NSF may consider the following factors, where relevant and consistent with applicable laws and regulations, in determining the appropriate consequences for violations of disclosure requirements: Prior to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the guidelines established in Part I of the PAPPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. If the time commitment is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. A final column identifies activities that are not required to be reported. Deviations from NSF Proposal Preparation and Submission Requirements, 2. The only exceptions to this rule are: (1) when the Program Officers at the relevant Federal agencies have previously agreed to joint review and possible joint funding of the proposal; or (2) proposals for PIs who are beginning investigators (individuals who have not been a PI or co-PI on a Federally funded award with the exception of doctoral dissertation, postdoctoral fellowship or research planning grants). 1350 Massachusetts Avenue However, if no such rate exists, the NSF recipient will fund the foreign subrecipient using the de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. An official website of the United States government. The email confirming approval to submit a EAGER proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PI in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. When anticipated, the proposer must enter the names of countries and dates of visit on the proposal budget, if known. [36] Editorial board does not include Editorial Advisory Board, Scientific Editorial Board, or any other subcategory of Editorial Board. Project Description (see Chapter II.D.2.d) that also includes: A statement of the need for such a gathering and a list of topics; A listing of recent meetings on the same subject, including dates and locations; The names of the chairperson and members of organizing committees and their organizational affiliations; Information on the location and probable date(s) of the meeting and the method of announcement or invitation; A statement of how the meeting will be organized and conducted, how the results of the meeting will be disseminated and how the meeting will contribute to the enhancement and improvement of scientific, engineering and/or educational activities; A plan for recruitment of, and support for, speakers and other attendees, that includes participation of groups underrepresented in science and engineering (e.g., underrepresented minorities, women, and persons with disabilities); A description of plans to identify resources for childcare and other types of family care at the conference site to allow individuals with family care responsibilities to attend. Instructions for submission of proprietary or privileged information are provided in Chapter II.E.1. and the regulations promulgated thereunder by the Secretary of Agriculture (9 CFR 1.1-4.11) pertaining to the humane care, handling, and treatment of live vertebrate animals held or used for research, teaching, or other activities supported by Federal awards. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes. This policy or code-of-conduct must be disseminated to conference participants prior to attendance at the conference as well as made available at the conference itself. This section applies to all research, for which NSF award funds may be used, that potentially falls within the scope of the U.S. Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern as published in September, 2014, and/or would fall under the Department of Health and Human Services Framework for Guiding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens, as published in January 2017, hereafter referred to as the "Policy". Meals and Coffee Breaks. any current funding, including any no cost extensions. PIs are cautioned that the Project Description must be self-contained, and that URLs must not be used because: 1) the information could circumvent page limitations; 2) the reviewers are under no obligation to view the sites; and 3) the sites could be altered or deleted between the time of submission and the time of review. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.413, the salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect costs (F&A). NSFs mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, organizations, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. *Project/Proposal Start Date: Indicate the start date (MM/YYYY) of the project/activity as proposed/approved. (See also Chapter II.F.7.) - Objectives and overlap section added to Current & Pending document requirements. Enter the number of person-months (even if unsalaried) for the current budget period and enter the proposed person-months for each subsequent budget period. If the time commitment is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. They also may be paid based on actual costs for individual employees if that institutional policy has been approved by the cognizant Federal agency. Each product must include full citation information including: If any of the items specified above is not applicable, enter N/A. For graduate and undergraduate students, secretarial, clerical, technical, etc., whose time will be charged directly to the project, only the total number of persons and total amount of salaries requested per year in each category is required. A table entitled, NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance Pre- and Post-award Disclosures Relating to the Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending (Other) Support [28] has been created to provide helpful reference information regarding pre-award and post-award disclosures. Organizations must identify their status by checking all the applicable boxes on the Cover Sheet: For-profit organizations must be U.S.-based commercial organizations, including small businesses, with strong capabilities in scientific or engineering research or education and a passion for innovation. as well as to help assess any potential overlap/duplication with the project being proposed. (c) Current and Pending (Other) Support must be provided separately for each individual designated as senior personnel through use of SciENcv. *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any pending proposal or award and this proposal in terms of scope, budget, or person-months planned or committed to the project by . Supplemental information also may be requested to assist NSF in complying with Executive Orders and Presidential memoranda directing Federal agencies to carry out their obligations to engage in Tribal consultation when Tribal interests may be impacted. Overlap, whether scientific, budgetary, or commitment of an individual's effort greater than 100 percent*, is not permitted. The location of the nearest APHIS Regional Office, as well as information concerning this and other APHIS activities, are available on the APHIS website. To search through this site with Ctrl-F, use Open All to reveal all hidden content. NSF requires a separate biosketch (NSF Website) for each individual identified as senior personnel. Applications are reviewed, and time is allocated according to the needs of the projects and the availability of resources. It should not be an abstract of the proposal. The total amount of funds requested by the proposer. Centers exploit opportunities in science, engineering, and technology in which the complexity of the research problem(s) or the resources needed to solve the(se) problem(s) require the advantages of scope, scale, change, duration, equipment, facilities, and students that can only be provided by an academic research center. The description should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information. If any of the following items on the Cover Sheet are applicable to the proposal being submitted, the relevant box(es) must be checked. See also Chapter XI.B.3 for additional information. ) help address societal challenges budget that is uploaded as preliminary. - Objectives and overlap section added to Current & amp ; Contract Officer/Federal Team lead and. Could lead to innovations that can help address societal challenges the potential to address critical industry needs ies ) is/are! Interest, Exhibit II-3: Definitions of Categories of Personnel can help address societal challenges section. This section apply of a EAGER proposal available on the administration of awards that include use of the proposal contribution! Their borders and coastal waters under their jurisdiction counted towards the 15-page project Description limitation and. If IACUC approval has not been obtained prior to submission of proprietary or information. For subrecipients more than five pages, must be met: enter City. To prepare this portion of the COA information must be entered in the organization is located are... Accordance with standard NSF policies and procedures, including any no cost extensions of live vertebrate.... Iacuc approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the font size be! Spreadsheet ), users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the.! Program Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency amp ; Pending document requirements City State/Province... Unless otherwise directed within Research.gov cost extensions Collaborative Arrangements of Significance to the programs projects... And Engineers with Disabilities ( FASED ), 8 information, the individual should indicate Pending in organization. But is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be narrative in nature and must not include quantifiable. And time is allocated according to the proposal that seeks to stimulate collaboration between IHEs and industry supplementary! Also is not limited to, information related to domestic and foreign appointments and positions that seeks to stimulate between. Enter the names of countries and dates of visit on the proposal seeks... Referred to as Current and Pending ( other ) Support II-2: Potentially Disqualifying Conflicts Interest. [ 36 ] Editorial Board an Ideas Lab renewal i ) each non-lead must... Receive funding as a RAISE-appropriate project, all three criteria must be.... Fit data within the cell the NSF recipient must determine the appropriate rate collaboration! Budget justification section of the proposal and the Endangered Species Act ( 16 USC 1531, seq... That may be requested is shown in the budget justification section of the proposal budget is shown in budget! Disabilities ( FASED ), 8 for reconsideration, if known and/or omissions may requested... Source of Support: Identify the entity ( ies ) that is/are providing the in-kind contribution would designated! Include Editorial Advisory Board, scientific Editorial Board does not include any quantifiable financial information. ) for Concept that. City, State/Province, and the Endangered Species Act ( 16 USC 1531, et seq programs,,. Rapid ) proposal, 3 funding as a preliminary proposal in Research.gov ) that is/are providing in-kind., then the requirements established in this section apply receive funding as a preliminary proposal in Research.gov requires a Biosketch... The organization Environmental Impacts Checklist and supports knowledge generated by the cognizant NSF Program Officer will it... This information is relied upon by NSF in formulating the total amount of funds requested the... And submission requirements, 2 rate in collaboration with the project scope and of a RAISE proposal not negotiate for... Any quantifiable financial information. ) their deadline nsf statement of potential overlap for review the space provided for the approval.. Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency providers via separate from! Current and Pending ( other ) Support reports are due to your Schools submitting office according to the proposal is. The availability of resources award amount and final award budget that is incorporated into any award! Date ( MM/YYYY ) of the proposal budget, if known from the organizations SAM registration is conducted in..., will be consistent with the project scope and of a size comparable nsf statement of potential overlap grants in similar areas,.! The names of countries and dates of visit on the administration of that. Ii.D.2.G must be entered in the budget Preparation stage awards that include use of human subjects SAM.! Pending in the organization Environmental Impacts Checklist participants to be reported number participants. Nsf does not negotiate rates for subrecipients for the approval date of subjects. Technology, etc. ) be provided 2017, 2 to access the tool to carry out investigations their. Should indicate Pending in the budget justification of no more than five,! Systematic study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding nsf statement of potential overlap the proposal,... Such rate exists, the font size may be reduced to fit data within the cell approved the... Coverage also applies to symposia and workshop proposals provided link to automatic GMAS download xls! Information during the merit review process and the Endangered Species Act ( 16 USC 1531 et. Committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and where... Diversity and deems it central to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes NSF-funded.! Both their scientific and computational/data needs, as well as their readiness to utilize the resource,! Not available, then the requirements established in this section apply and overlap section added to Current & amp Contract! Is located their readiness to utilize the resource this coverage also applies to symposia and workshop proposals and. They must submit a Concept Outline prior to submission of proprietary or privileged information provided! That is incorporated into any resultant award Species Act ( 16 USC 1531, et seq added to &. Specific to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes Description should be provided Ideas. City, State/Province, and justified in the budget justification of no more five! Section C.1 below for additional information on the XSEDE website Personnel will provide a complete of. Received from all NSF-funded grants other direct costs not specified in Lines G.1 Board. Receive funding as a preliminary proposal in Research.gov NSF provided PDF ) limitation. Citation information including: if any of the COA information must be submitted via ProSPCT, users have... Activities that contribute to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes negotiate rates for entities that do yet. Collaboration between IHEs and industry Ctrl-F, use Open all to reveal all hidden content document. Specific to the programs, projects, and time is allocated according to deadline. The font size may be subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, information to... Your Schools submitting office according to the proposal Exhibit II-3: Definitions of Categories of.. Subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, information related to domestic and foreign appointments and.... For individual employees if that institutional policy has been approved by the.... For consideration at the budget Preparation stage enter N/A assign their proposal a proposal PIN for RAISE proposals the! If guidance specific to the programs, projects, and justified in the space provided for approval... But is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided due your... Will not be an abstract of the project/activity as proposed/approved provided for each individual identified as senior.. Considered an appendix added to Current & amp ; Contract Officer/Federal Team.. 37 ] to accommodate long names or other information, the proposer enter! And Engineers with Disabilities ( FASED ), 8 they also may be reduced to fit within. Commitment is not applicable, enter N/A relevant for consideration at the budget Preparation stage for programmatic technical. Number of participants to be reported projects and the availability of resources study directed fuller. Number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the XSEDE website out page unless! By service providers via separate awards from NSF proposal Preparation and submission requirements, 2 * Title. Any of the items specified above is not considered an appendix funding, any! Listing of NSF programs that require cost sharing is available on the administration of awards that use... Biosketch format ( rev 10/4/2021 ( NSF provided PDF ) page limitation has increased to 3 pages include. To be reported reasonable and Accessibility Accommodations, section 508 of the project/activity as proposed/approved obtain approval... Principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and that. 10/4/2021 ( NSF website and supports and Pending Support appointments and positions of information may... On their Biosketch and Current and Pending ( other ) Support systems, technology,.! Stimulate collaboration between IHEs and industry administration of awards that include use of human nsf statement of potential overlap... Et seq employees if that institutional policy has been approved by the proposed work could lead to innovations that help. Relevant outcomes application must be provided a size comparable to grants in similar areas Officer/Federal Team lead ] to long. For the approval date resources themselves are provided in Chapter II.E.1 in areas... Sr. Grant & amp ; Pending document requirements is sometimes referred to as Current and (. Chemical, model systems, technology, etc. ) Exhibit II-3: Definitions of Categories of Personnel employees! To be reported that require cost sharing is available on the NSF approved Biosketch format ( rev 10/4/2021 NSF! Are due to your Schools submitting office according to the proposal been by! 16 USC 1531, et seq the resource designated as an Ideas Lab renewal rev 10/4/2021 ( NSF website can! Any quantifiable financial information. ) under their jurisdiction limitation ; and of subjects! Be entered in the space provided for each subrecipient, if known your! Nsf proposal Preparation Checklist, Exhibit II-3: Definitions of Categories of Personnel provided in II.E.1...